Yes — but with a big asterisk. I’d recommend it if you enjoy long, character-driven historical fiction and don’t mind a slower middle. If you need tight pacing, I’d probably skip it.
Set in 1933 Oxford, Mississippi, the novel follows 11-year-old Meg, an orphan, alongside Birdie and Charlie, three women whose lives collide as they try to survive poverty, restrictive social expectations, and difficult circumstances.
It’s 656 pages. And that’s important.
A recurring criticism from readers is that the story gets drawn out in the middle, with some feeling it could have been substantially shorter.
There are also some dark and uncomfortable subjects, including poverty, alcoholism, sex work, abuse, forced sterilization/eugenics, and discrimination.
And if you’re expecting The Help 2.0, I’d adjust those expectations. It’s another Southern historical novel from Stockett, but the story and focus are quite different.
The response has been very positive overall: Goodreads currently shows about 4.62/5 from more than 205,000 ratings, although there is a noticeable minority who found it too long or disliked some of the later plot developments.
Definitely read it if you like:
Maybe skip it if you prefer:
Is it worth reading? Yes — I think The Unknown is worth reading, especially if you…
Is it worth reading? Yes — I’d say Mad Mabel is worth reading, especially if you…
⭐ Is Death Row by Freida McFadden worth reading? Yes, but with reservations. It's a…
⭐ Is Yesteryear by Caro Claire Burke worth reading? Yes—with reservations. Yesteryear is a clever,…
⭐ Is The Oxford Detective Society worth reading? Yes — if you enjoy cozy, classic…
⭐ Is The Summer We Lie worth reading? Yes—especially if you love forbidden, age-gap romance…